B.
Decisions to deal jointly with communications (rule 88) ...............
9
Nos. 324
and 325/1988
J. B. and H. K. v. F.............................................................
9
Nos. 343, 344,
345/1988
R. A. V. N. et al. v. A. .......................................................
10
Reversal of decision on admissibility..............................................
14
Croes v. The Netherlands ...................................................
14
B.
Decisions declaring a communication inadmissible** ...................
19
No. 213/1986
[35]
H. C. M. A. v. The Netherlands ..........................................
19
No. 220/1987* [37] a
T. K. v. France ...................................................................
23
No. 224/1987
[33]
A. & S. N. v. Norway .........................................................
28
No. 236/1987
[33]
V. M. R. B. v. Canada ........................................................
30
No. 266/1987
[35]
A. M. v. Italy .....................................................................
34
No. 268/1987
[37]
M. G. B. and S. P. v. Trinidad and Tobago .........................
36
No. 273/1988
[35]
B. d B. et. al. v. The Netherlands ........................................
37
No. 275/1988
[38]a
S. E. v. Argentina ...............................................................
41
No. 296/1988
[35]
J. R. C. v. Costa Rica .........................................................
44
No. 297/1988
[37]
H. A. E. d. J. v. The Netherlands ........................................
47
No. 300/1988* [35]
J. H. v. Finland...................................................................
50
No. 306/1988
J. G. v. The Netherlands .....................................................
51
FINAL DECISIONS
A.
No. 164/1984
[39]
3