CAT/C/61/D/659/2015 United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Distr.: General 15 September 2017 Original: English Committee against Torture Decision adopted by the Committee under article 22 of the Convention, concerning communication No. 659/2015*, ** Communication submitted by: R.R.L. (represented by counsel, Rachel Benaroch) Alleged victims: The complainant, his wife, D.R.L., children, L.S.L., L.P.L., L.V.L. and L.D.L., and a daughter-in-law, P.S.A. State party: Canada Date of complaint: 2 February 2015 (initial submission) Date of present decision: 10 August 2017 Subject matter: Deportation to Sri Lanka Substantive issue: Non-refoulement Procedural issues: Non-exhaustion; non-substantiation of claims Article of the Convention: 3 1.1 The complainant is R.R.L., a Sri Lankan national of Tamil ethnicity, born in 1966. He submits a complaint in his own name, as well as on behalf of his wife, D.R.L. (born in 1969), their four children, L.S.L. (born in 1991), L.P.L. (born in 1995), L.V.L. (born in 1995) and L.D.L. (born in 2000), and a daughter-in-law, P.S.A. (born in 1992). They were all born in the Eastern Province, Sri Lanka, and are Christians.1 At the time of submission of the complaint, they were awaiting deportation to Sri Lanka, following the rejection of their asylum application by the Canadian authorities. The complainant claims that his and his family’s deportation to Sri Lanka would constitute a violation by Canada of article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. He is represented by counsel, Rachel Benaroch. 1.2 On 16 February 2015, pursuant to rule 114, paragraph 1, of its rules of procedure (CAT/C/3/Rev.6), the Committee, acting through its Rapporteur on new complaints and interim measures, requested the State party not to deport the complainant and his family to Sri Lanka, while the complaint was being considered by the Committee. On 29 October 2015, the Committee, acting through the same Rapporteur, denied the State party’s requests of 12 June 2015 and 14 August 2015 to lift interim measures. * Adopted by the Committee at its sixty-first session (24 July-11 August 2017). ** The following members of the Committee participated in the examination of the communication: 1 Essadia Belmir, Alessio Bruni, Felice Gaer, Abdelwahab Hani, Claude Heller Rouassant, Jens Modvig, Sapana Pradhan-Malla, Ana Racu, Sébastien Touzé and Kening Zhang. The complainant’s daughter-in-law, originally a Muslim, converted to Christianity on 1 August 2012, the day she married the complainant’s son, L.S.L. GE.17-16198(E) 

Select target paragraph3