3 lic. iur. Uwe Langenbahn, who formally also serves as Director of the National Prison. On the occasion of this meeting, the recommendations made in writing by the Corrections Commission and the NPM in past quarterly and annual reports were discussed verbally, and the Government made comments on those recommendations. Pertinent details on the individual points will be mentioned below. II. FACTS IDENTIFIED DURING THE VISITS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MADE A) Vaduz National Prison: Of the visits mentioned at the beginning, the NPM paid three unannounced visits and one announced visit to the Vaduz National Prison in 2016. The number of detainees during the visits varied between 6 and 20 and included both convicted prisoners and prisoners on remand as well as detainees awaiting deportation. They were primarily male, although some of them were female. In every case, prison staff readily provided the NPM with the information desired and granted inspection of all the corrections records requested. Immediate access was likewise granted to all facilities that the members of the NPM wished to visit. It was also possible for the NPM to carry out confidential discussions with prison staff and the management of the prison as well as with prisoners on remand, convicted prisoners, and detainees awaiting deportation. During these visits, the NPM was able to gain a good overview of the detention conditions. As in previous years, these continue to be good. No complaints whatsoever of mistreatment or other inhuman treatment were made by detainees in relation to imprisonment. On the contrary, the NPM satisfied itself again in the year under review of the predominantly good atmosphere within the prison.

Select target paragraph3