CONTENTS (Selected decisions—Fifty-sixth to sixty-seventh sessions) Page Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 FINAL DECISIONS A. B. Decisions declaring a communication inadmissible ...................................................... (the number of the Committee session is indicated in brackets) 5 No. 593/1994 [58] Patrick Holland v. Ireland ........................................................ 5 No. 608/1995 [57] Franz Nahlik v. Austria ........................................................... 9 No. 643/1995 [60] Peter Drobek v. Slovakia ......................................................... 13 No. 645/1995 [57] Vaihere Bordes and John Temeharo v. France ........................ 15 No. 669/1995 [64] Gerhard Malik v. Czech Republic ........................................... 19 No. 670/1995 [64] Rüdiger Schlosser v. Czech Republic ..................................... 23 Views under article 5 (4) of the Optional Protocol Nos. 422/1990, [57] 423/1990 and 424/1990 Adimayo M. Aduayom, Sofianou T. Diasso and Yawo S. Dobou v. Togo ................................................... 28 No. 454/1991 [55] Enrique García Pons v. Spain .................................................. 32 No. 480/1991 [57] José Luis García Fuenzalida v. Ecuador .................................. 35 No. 526/1993 [59] Michael and Brian Hill v. Spain .............................................. 39 No. 538/1993 [58] Charles Stewart v. Canada ....................................................... 49 No. 540/1993 [56] Rosario Celis Laureano v. Peru ............................................... 63 No. 549/1993 [60] Francis Hopu and Tepoaitu Bessert v. France ......................... 68 No. 552/1993 [60] Wieslaw Kall v. Poland ........................................................... 76 No. 554/1993 [61] Robinson LaVende v. Trinidad & Tobago .............................. 82 No. 555/1993 [61] Ramcharan Bickaroo v. Trinidad & Tobago ........................... 86 No. 560/1993 [59] A. v. Australia .......................................................................... 89 No. 563/1993 [55] Nydia Erika Bautista de Arellana v. Colombia ........................ 103 No. 574/1994 [64] Keun-Tae Kim v. Republic of Korea ....................................... 110 No. 577/1994 [61] Victor Alfredo Polay Campos v. Peru ..................................... 117 No. 586/1994 [57] Joseph Frank Adam v. Czech Republic ................................... 121 No. 588/1994 [56] Errol Johnson v. Jamaica ......................................................... 126 No. 612/1995 [60] José Vicente and Amado Villafañe Chaparro, Dioselina Torres Crespo, Hermes Enrique Torres Solis and Vicencio Chaparro Izquierdo v. Colombia ............................................. 135 Nos. 623, 624, [62] 626 and 627/1995 Victor Domukovsky, Zaza Tsiklauri, Petre Gelbakhiani and Irakli Dokvadze v. Georgia ..................................................... 142 No. 628/1995 [64] Tae Joon Park v. Republic of Korea ........................................ 153 No. 633/1995 [65] Robert W.Gauthier v. Canada .................................................. 158 No. 671/1995 [58] Jouni E. Länsman, Jouni A. Länsman, Eino Länsman and Marko Torikka v. Finland ........................................................ 167 No. 692/1996 [60] A.R.J. v Australia .................................................................... 177 No. 676/1996 [62] Abdool Saleem Yasseen and Noel Thomas v. Guyana ........... 184 iii

Select target paragraph3