CEDAW/C/55/D/40/2012 1.2 At the request of the author and after reviewing her case, the Working Group on Communications, acting on behalf of the Committee, and pursuant to article 5, (1) of the Optional Protocol and rule 63 of the Committee’s rules of procedure, decided to grant interim measures requesting the State party to refrain from expelling the author and her two minor children to Pakistan while her communication was under consideration by the Committee. The State party acceded to that request. 1.3 On 6 July 2012, the Committee, acting through its Working Group on Communications, decided, pursuant to rule 66 of the Committee’s rules of procedure, to consider the admissibility of the communication separately from its merits. Factual background 2.1 The author and her family are from Rawalpindi, Pakistan, and belong to the Christian minority of Anglo-Indians, who speak English as their mother tongue. The author claims that she has always been subjected to discrimination as a Christian and that, when she became a young woman, this discrimination turned into sexual harassment. She refers to frequent incidents of verbal assault in public, as well as the touching of her intimate parts by unspecified individuals. She submits that, when she was about 16 years old, a Muslim man named A. G. asked her to date him. He said that he would have her “on the side”, that is, not for a serious relationship, because, in his opinion, as a Christian woman she was allowed to have premarital sexual relationships. When she refused, he threatened her with reprisals, but she did not take his threats seriously. However, in March 2002, the police came to the author’s house and arrested one of her brothers without any grounds. A. G. called the next day saying that her brother had been arrested at his request, since his brother was a high-ranking police official. The author’s brother was released after the family had paid a bribe. 2.2 Following these events, the author’s family decided to move to another location. In 2003, the author secured employment at a hospital. A. G. learned this and came to the hospital to shout at and insult her, saying that they had had a relationship but that she had cheated on him. As a result, the author was forced to resign. She left her second job because she was sexually harassed by her boss, who considered Christian women to be of easy virtue. At her next job, in a bank, she was again exposed to sexual harassment by her superiors. In addition, one day A. G. came to her office and told her boss that she had had a relationship with him and that her family was involved in prostitution. As a result of such humiliation, she left her job. 2.3 The author obtained an au pair visa for Denmark with the help of her sister, who was living there. She arrived in Denmark in January 2007. A. G. reiterated his threats by calling the telephone number of her sister in Denmark. The author continued to receive threats on a daily basis. 1 One day, A. G. told her to contact her family in Pakistan. When she did, she learned that her elder brother had been arrested by the police without any grounds and had been badly beaten in detention. The family obtained her brother’s release by paying a bribe. __________________ 1 13-42833 The material on file does not show that the author had sought the assistance of the State party’s police in connection with the threats received. 3/13

Select target paragraph3