CONTENTS
(Selected decisions – fortieth to forty-sixth sessions)
Page
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
INTERLOCUTORY DECISIONS
Decisions transmitting a communication to the State party (rule 91)
and requesting interim measures of protection (rule 86)
No. 486/1992
K. C. v. Canada ............................................................... 5
FINAL DECISIONS
A.
Decisions declaring a communication inadmissible
(the number of the Committee session is indicated in brackets)
No. 310/1988
No. 347/1988a
No. 354/1989a
No. 358/1989
No. 397/1990a
No. 408/1990
No. 409/1990
No. 413/1990
No. 432/1990
No. 446/1991
No. 486/1992
B.
[41]
[43]
[40]
[43]
[45]
[45]
[40]
[40]
[46]
[43]
[45]
M. T. v. Spain ................................................................... 7
S. G. v. France ................................................................. 8
L. G. v. Mauritius ........................................................... 12
R. L. et al. v. Canada ..................................................... 16
P. S. v. Denmark ............................................................ 22
W. J. H. v. the Netherlands ............................................ 27
E. M. E. H. v France ...................................................... 29
A. B. et al. v. Italy .......................................................... 30
W. B. E. v. the Netherlands ............................................ 32
J. P. v. Canada ............................................................... 36
K. C. v. Canada ............................................................. 38
Views under article 5(4) of the Optional Protocol
(the Committee’s Views in each case incorporate the relevant paragraphs
of its earlier decision on admissibility)
No. 205/1986b
Nos. 221/1987
and 323/1988b
No. 237/1987c
No. 240/1987c
No. 253/1987c
No. 263/1987
Nos. 270/1988
and 271/1988c
No. 277/1988c
No. 289/1988
Nos. 298/1988
and 299/1988b
No. 319/1988
No. 327/1988b
[43]
Donald Marshall et al. v. Canada ................................. 40
[41]
[46]
[43]
[41]
[46]
Yves Cadoret and Hervé le Bihan v. France .................. 43
Denroy Gordon v. Jamaica ........................................... 47
Willard Collins v. Jamaica ............................................ 52
Paul Kelly v. Jamaica .................................................... 60
Miguel González del Río v. Peru ................................... 68
[44]
[44]
[44]
Randolph Barrett and Clyde Sutcliffe v. Jamaica .......... 71
Juan Terán Jijón v. Ecuador ......................................... 76
Dieter Wolf v. Panama .................................................. 80
[40]
[43]
[41]
G. L. Lindgren et al. v. Sweden....................................... 84
Edgar A. Canón García v. Ecuador .............................. 90
Hervé Barzhig v. France ............................................... 92
a
Pursuant to rule 92(3) of the Committee’s rules of procedure (CCPR/C/3/Rev.2), an individual opinion or joint
individual opinions is/are appended to the decision.
b
Disclose[s] no violation.
c
Pursuant to rule 94(3) of the rules of procedure (CCPR/C/3/Rev.3), an individual opinion or joint individual opinions
is/are appended to the Views.
iii