CONTENTS
(Selected decisions—Seventy-fifth to eighty-fourth sessions)
Page
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................
1
FINAL DECISIONS
A.
Decisions declaring a communication inadmissible
(the number of the Committee session is indicated in brackets)
N° 837/1998
N° 901/1999
N° 939/2000
N° 989/2001
N° 1019/2001
N° 1024/2001
N° 1138/2002
N° 1220/2003
B.
[78]
[81]
[83]
[78]
[80]
[80]
[80]
[84]
Janusz Kolanowski v. Poland...........................................
Laing; Deborah, Jessica and Samuel v. Australia ............
Georges Dupuy v. Canada................................................
Walter Kollar v. Austria ...................................................
Barcáiztegui v. Spain........................................................
Sanlés Sanlés v. Spain ......................................................
Arenz et al. v. Germany....................................................
Walter Hoffman and Gwen Simpson v. Canada .............
3
6
16
21
27
35
39
45
Views under article 5 (4) of the Optional Protocol
N° 757/1997
N° 778/1997
N° 781/1997
N° 811/1998
N° 815/1998
N° 823/1998
N° 829/1998
N° 836/1998
N° 848/1999
N° 854/1999
N° 868/1999
N° 875/1999
N° 879/1999
N° 886/1999
N° 900/1999
N° 909/2000
N° 910/2000
N° 916/2000
N° 926/2000
N° 931/2000
N° 932/2000
N° 933/2000
N° 943/2000
N° 950/2000
N° 960/2000
[76]
[76]
[78]
[81]
[81]
[83]
[78]
[77]
[75]
[75]
[79]
[78]
[84]
[77]
[76]
[81]
[79]
[75]
[80]
[82]
[75]
[78]
[81]
[78]
[78]
Alzbeta Pezoldova v. Czech Republic .............................
José Antonio Coronel et al. v. Colombia..........................
Azer Aliev v. Ukraine .....................................................
Lallman and Bhartaj Mulai v. Guyana ............................
Alexander Dugin v. Russian Federation ..........................
Czernin v. Czech Republic ..............................................
Judge v. Canada................................................................
Kestutis Gelazauskas v. Lithuania ...................................
Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Orejuela v. Colombia ..............
Wackenheim v. France .....................................................
Wilson v. Philippines .......................................................
Jan Filipovich v. Lithuania ..............................................
George Howard v. Canada ..............................................
Natalia Schedko v. Belarus .............................................
C. v. Australia...................................................................
Victor Ivan Majuwana Kankanamge v. Sri Lanka ..........
Ati Antoine Randolph v. Togo ........................................
Jayawardena v. Sri Lanka.................................................
Hak-Chul Shin v. Republic of Korea ..............................
Raihon Hudoyberganova v. Uzbekistan ..........................
Marie-Hélène Gillot v. France .........................................
68 magistrates v. Democratic Republic of the Congo .......
Guido Jakobs v. Belgium .................................................
Sarma v. Sri Lanka ...........................................................
Baumgarten v. Germany...................................................
iii
51
60
67
72
75
79
85
101
106
110
114
122
126
136
141
157
162
168
172
176
180
194
198
210
218