CCPR/C/119/D/2185/2012 1968, respectively. They claim that the State party has violated Rajendra Dhakal’s rights under articles 6, 7, 9, 10 and 16, separately and read in conjunction with article 2 (3) of the Covenant; Bimala and Rabindra Dhakal’s rights under article 7, read alone and in conjunction with article 2 (3); and Manjima Dhakal’s rights under article 7, read in conjunction with articles 2 (3) and 24 (1) of the Covenant. The Covenant and its Optional Protocol entered into force for the State party on 14 August 1991. The authors are represented by counsel. The facts as submitted by the authors 2.1 As a result of the armed conflict that started in 1996 in the State party between the Government and the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), there was a marked deterioration in the human rights situation in the country. All parties to the conflict, including the police and the Royal Nepalese Army, committed atrocities, and enforced disappearances became a widespread phenomenon.1 Reliable sources indicate that there was a large number of cases of enforced disappearances in Nepal in 2003 and 2004.2 The victims were mainly Maoist sympathizers or supporters, many of whom were students, businessmen, farmers, journalists and human rights defenders. 3 2.2 Rajendra Dhakal and the first author (Bimala Dhakal) have three children. Rajendra Dhakal was a human rights defender and a member of the Nepal Bar Association. He worked in a law firm called Progressive Legal Services Centre and was Chair of the Gorkha district branch of the Forum for the Protection of Human Rights. He was also district secretary of the United People’s Front, an umbrella organization of various Communist groups, until 1995. He resigned from that post when the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) started the armed conflict in February 1996. Between March and June 1996, he was illegally detained by the Nepalese police and released by order of a district court in June 1996. During his detention he was ill-treated, tortured and was permitted almost no contact with the outside world. In June 1998, in the framework of a homicide and robbery case in Tanahun District Court, he was charged of attacking police personnel, carrying explosives, opening fire indiscriminately and killing a police deputy inspector. A warrant and summons were issued against him. At that time, Rajendra Dhakal was actively working as a lawyer in cases of torture and harassment by State agents. After the issuance of the arrest warrant against him, he began receiving death threats from the security forces. As a result, in August 1998 he ended his legal career and went into hiding. 2.3 On 8 January 1999, Rajendra Dhakal was attending a closed-door political awareness programme at Jamdi village, Khairenitar, in Tanahun District. As he approached the stream in Jamdi, he was arrested by the police. Two other persons, P.B.T and N.D.A., primary school teachers, were also arrested and taken to Bel Chautara Area Police Office. However, they were separated from Rajendra Dhakal, who was put in solitary confinement. That was the last time he was seen. After two days, the teachers were released. 2.4 In the following days, the first author, who had last seen her husband one month earlier in Chitwan, heard rumours about Rajendra Dhakal’s arrest. At her request, the second author (Rabindra Dhakal) started searching for his brother. Between 12 and 19 January 1999, the second author visited the District Police Office in Tanahun, the District Police Office in Nawalparasi, the District Police Office in Kaski, Pokhara, and the Armed Police Battalion, Pokhara. The officers in charge in all those places informed him that his brother had been transferred to another police post. At the Armed Police Battalion, Pokhara, he was informed that Rajendra Dhakal had been transferred to the District Police Office in Gorkha. The second author visited the Gorkha office, where he was informed that Rajendra Dhakal was indeed there, but he was not allowed to visit him. A few weeks later, the 1 2 3 2 The authors refer to the report of the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances on its mission to Nepal (E/CN.4/2005/65/Add.1), and the report of the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment on his mission to Nepal (E/CN.4/2006/6/Add.5). The authors refer to Human Rights Watch and Advocacy Forum, Waiting for Justice: Unpunished Crimes from Nepal’s Armed Conflict (New York, Human Rights Watch, 2008), p. 11. See E/CN.4/2005/65/Add.1.

Select target paragraph3